Decolonizing History with Lies
The movement to “decolonize history” has gained momentum in recent years, seeking to reframe and reclaim narratives that have historically been marginalized or distorted by colonial powers. At its core, this endeavor is essential, as it exposes the biases and erasures that have shaped our understanding of the past. However, a worrying trend has emerged: in the rush to correct historical wrongs, certain factions have perpetuated inaccuracies of their own. One such example is the oft-repeated claim that a Black man, Lewis Latimer, invented the light bulb, displacing Thomas Edison. This narrative, while well-intentioned, distorts the truth and raises serious questions about the integrity of the decolonization movement when it relies on misleading information.
The Invention of the Light Bulb: A Historical Overview
The invention of the light bulb is one of the most iconic achievements of the 19th century. Thomas Edison is widely credited with perfecting the incandescent light bulb, a feat for which he secured a patent in 1879. However, it is essential to acknowledge that the development of the light bulb was a collaborative process, building on previous work by inventors such as Sir Humphry Davy, Warren de la Rue, and Joseph Swan. Edison’s innovation lay in creating a practical, long-lasting bulb, primarily by identifying the right filament material and vacuum environment to ensure the bulb’s longevity.
Joseph Swan: The True Pioneer of the Electric Light Bulb
When most people think of the invention of the light bulb, the name Thomas Edison inevitably comes to mind. While Edison played a pivotal role in the development of practical incandescent lighting, the true story of the light bulb’s invention is more complex and spans several decades of experimentation and innovation. One of the key figures in this history, often overlooked in popular narratives, is Joseph Swan, a British physicist and chemist who, by all accounts, was the real inventor of the incandescent light bulb.
The Early Work of Joseph Swan
Joseph Swan’s journey into the world of electric lighting began as early as the 1840s, long before Edison entered the scene. Swan, born in 1828 in Sunderland, England, was a talented chemist with a deep interest in the possibilities of electricity. Inspired by earlier discoveries in electric lighting, such as Sir Humphry Davy’s creation of an electric arc light in 1802, Swan began experimenting with incandescent lighting—an idea that revolved around passing an electric current through a filament to produce light.
By 1860, Swan had already demonstrated a working prototype of an electric light bulb. He used a carbonized paper filament inside a vacuum-sealed glass bulb. However, his early experiments were hindered by the fact that vacuum technology at the time was not advanced enough to keep the filament from burning out quickly. The bulbs would glow but had very short lifespans, making them impractical for widespread use.
Nevertheless, Swan’s work was groundbreaking. His experiments laid the foundation for future advancements, and over the following decades, he continued to refine his design. In 1878, Swan finally developed a more durable light bulb, thanks to improvements in vacuum pumps and his use of a better carbonized filament. This version of the light bulb worked reliably and was ready for commercial production.
Swan’s Incandescent Bulb and Public Demonstration
Swan’s major breakthrough came in 1878 when he demonstrated his improved incandescent light bulb at a lecture in Newcastle upon Tyne. This demonstration marked the first public showing of a working electric light bulb, and it generated significant interest in the potential of electric lighting. Swan soon began installing his bulbs in homes and public buildings, including Cragside, the home of Lord Armstrong, which became the first house in the world to be lit by electricity.
In 1880, Swan patented his design in the UK, officially marking his claim as the inventor of the practical incandescent light bulb. Swan’s bulbs used a carbonized paper filament, which gave the bulb a much longer lifespan and made it suitable for widespread use. He began commercial production of his light bulbs through his company, The Swan Electric Light Company, and installed electric lighting in several notable locations, including the Savoy Theatre in London.
The Edison-Swan Controversy
While Swan was perfecting his bulb in England, Thomas Edison was simultaneously working on a similar design in the United States. Edison famously patented his incandescent light bulb in the U.S. in 1879, using a carbon filament and a vacuum to prevent the filament from burning out quickly. Although Edison’s bulb was similar to Swan’s, Edison’s major contribution was not the invention of the light bulb itself, but rather the creation of a complete electrical system for generating and distributing electricity.
As Edison’s fame grew, legal battles erupted between Swan and Edison over the true origins of the incandescent light bulb. In 1883, the two inventors decided to merge their interests and formed a joint venture called Ediswan, which combined Swan’s British patents with Edison’s American technological developments. This partnership helped solidify Swan’s role in the history of electric lighting, even if Edison continued to be celebrated as the primary inventor in popular culture.
The Lasting Legacy of Joseph Swan
Despite Edison’s greater fame, Joseph Swan’s role as the true inventor of the incandescent light bulb is well documented. His tireless work, spanning several decades, resulted in the creation of the first practical and commercially viable electric light bulb. Swan’s light bulbs illuminated homes, theatres, and public spaces in Britain long before Edison’s bulbs became widely used in the United States.
Swan’s legacy extends beyond just the light bulb. He was a prolific inventor and contributed to the development of photographic printing with his invention of the dry plate process, which revolutionized photography by allowing for easier and faster image development. Swan was also a fellow of the Royal Society and received numerous accolades for his contributions to science and technology.
While Thomas Edison’s contributions to the development of the light bulb and the electrical distribution system were monumental, Joseph Swan deserves recognition as the true inventor of the incandescent light bulb. His early work in the 1860s and his successful public demonstration in 1878 predated Edison’s efforts and laid the foundation for the widespread use of electric lighting. Swan’s name may not be as widely recognized as Edison’s today, but his pioneering work fundamentally changed the world and ushered in the era of electric light. It is time that Swan’s contributions to one of the most important inventions of the modern age are fully acknowledged.
The Role of Lewis Latimer: An Important Contributor, Not the Inventor
Lewis Latimer, an African American inventor and draftsman, did play a crucial role in improving light bulb technology, but he was not the inventor of the light bulb. Latimer worked for Edison’s company, and in 1881, he developed a method for producing carbon filaments, which were more durable and cost-effective than previous materials. His contribution helped extend the life of the light bulb, making it more commercially viable. Latimer’s achievements are significant, particularly given the racial barriers of the time, but they must be placed in their proper historical context.
By claiming that Latimer invented the light bulb, advocates distort both Latimer’s legacy and the broader history of innovation. Such claims are part of a well-meaning, but ultimately harmful, trend in decolonizing history that substitutes one myth for another. In attempting to elevate marginalized figures, some seek to entirely rewrite established historical narratives, muddying the waters between genuine accomplishments and false claims.
The Danger of Replacing One Myth with Another
The push to reframe history is often driven by a desire to correct longstanding injustices, particularly the exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and other non-European contributions from mainstream historical accounts. This is an important and necessary effort, but it must be done with a commitment to historical accuracy. When decolonization efforts are built on falsehoods, they risk discrediting the broader movement. If advocates of a more inclusive history are seen as spreading misinformation, it becomes easier for detractors to dismiss legitimate historical grievances and accomplishments.
The claim that Latimer invented the light bulb, for example, is not just a harmless exaggeration. It undermines the actual achievements of African American inventors like Latimer by presenting them as something they were not. In doing so, it diminishes the very real challenges they overcame and the genuine contributions they made. Worse, such distortions provide ammunition to those who argue that the movement to decolonize history is nothing more than a politically motivated rewriting of the past.
The Importance of Truth in Decolonizing History
Decolonizing history should not be about creating new myths or simply inverting traditional narratives to suit contemporary political agendas. Instead, it should be about uncovering the full scope of human achievement, with all its complexities, contradictions, and nuances. It involves recognizing the contributions of historically marginalized groups without resorting to revisionism or distorting the facts.
In the case of Lewis Latimer, his actual accomplishments should be celebrated: he was an integral part of a groundbreaking industry and helped shape the modern world through his improvements to light bulb technology. He was also a trailblazer for Black inventors in an era of systemic racial discrimination. Acknowledging these facts does far more to honor his legacy than fabricating a story that falsely credits him with an invention that he did not create.
The desire to decolonize history is a noble one, rooted in the need for justice, recognition, and inclusion. However, it must be pursued with honesty and integrity. The false narrative surrounding Lewis Latimer and the invention of the light bulb illustrates the danger of rewriting history in ways that sacrifice truth for political or ideological gain. If the goal is to create a more accurate and inclusive historical record, then that goal must be grounded in facts, not fiction. Only through a careful, honest examination of the past can we hope to build a more just and equitable understanding of history for future generations.
When lies become truths
It’s important to approach the history of Black inventors with care, as misinformation can distort their genuine contributions. While efforts to celebrate Black history have sometimes led to the spread of inaccurate claims, this should not detract from the very real accomplishments of African American inventors. Below are a few examples of common misconceptions or exaggerated claims about Black inventors:
1. Garrett Morgan Invented the Traffic Light
- Fact: Garrett Morgan, an African American inventor, did patent a traffic signal in 1923. However, the first known traffic light was installed in London in 1868, and an electric version was developed by Lester Wire in 1912. Morgan’s version improved upon existing designs by adding a third signal (stop-and-go lights already existed).
2. Elijah McCoy Invented the Steam Engine Lubricator
- Fact: Elijah McCoy, a Canadian-American inventor, did develop a highly effective steam engine lubricator in the 1870s, which led to the phrase “the real McCoy” referring to his high-quality invention. However, he did not invent the steam engine or lubrication systems; he simply improved them with his automatic oil-drip cup design.
3. Granville T. Woods Invented the Telegraph
- Fact: Granville T. Woods, an African American inventor, did not invent the telegraph itself, which dates back to Samuel Morse’s work in the 1830s. However, Woods made significant contributions to electrical systems, including improvements to the telegraph and the invention of the “telegraphony,” a device that combined telegraph and telephone technology.
4. Madam C.J. Walker Invented Hair Care Products
- Fact: While Madam C.J. Walker is often credited with inventing African American hair care products, her real contribution was in building a successful business empire that revolutionized the beauty industry for Black women. She did not invent the products from scratch; she improved and popularized existing hair care formulas, developing her own line and creating an important economic legacy.
5. George Washington Carver Invented Peanut Butter
- Fact: George Washington Carver, a celebrated agricultural scientist, did not invent peanut butter, which existed before his time. His contributions were in promoting the use of peanuts and developing hundreds of products from them, including oils, dyes, and cosmetics, but peanut butter itself was already being made by the Aztecs and other cultures before his innovations.
6. Jack Johnson Invented the Wrench
- Fact: Jack Johnson, the first African American world heavyweight boxing champion, is often claimed to have invented the wrench. While Johnson did patent a type of wrench in 1922, wrenches were in use long before his design. His version was a specific improvement to pipe-wrench technology.
7. Philip Emeagwali Invented the Internet
- Fact: Philip Emeagwali, a Nigerian computer scientist, is sometimes credited with inventing the internet. While he did contribute to computational methods used in high-performance computing, the invention of the internet is a complex process involving many figures over decades, including Vint Cerf, Robert Kahn, and Tim Berners-Lee. Emeagwali’s contributions were important in the field of supercomputing, but he did not invent the internet.
While some of these myths arise from a desire to highlight underappreciated contributions of Black inventors, it’s crucial to separate fact from fiction. African American and other Black inventors have made significant contributions to science, technology, and culture, and their genuine accomplishments deserve to be celebrated on their own merits without the need for historical exaggeration or distortion.
The Legacy of the Banjo
The history of African slavery is marked by unimaginable suffering and exploitation, but it also includes stories of cultural resilience, creativity, and survival. One of the most significant yet often overlooked contributions of enslaved Africans to global culture is the invention of the banjo, an instrument that has since become iconic in American folk, bluegrass, and country music. While the horrors of slavery should never be overshadowed, it’s important to recognize that even in such brutal conditions, enslaved people managed to innovate and preserve pieces of their heritage. The banjo, as a symbol of cultural endurance, stands as a testament to this resilience.
The Origins of the Banjo
The banjo’s roots can be traced back to West Africa, where various stringed instruments, including those similar to the banjo, were played for centuries before the transatlantic slave trade. Instruments like the akonting (from the Jola people of Senegal and Gambia), the ngoni (played in Mali), and other lute-like instruments were central to the musical traditions of several African cultures. These instruments typically had a gourd body, animal skin stretched over the top, and a long neck with strings.
When Africans were forcibly brought to the Americas as slaves, they brought with them their music and instruments, which played a vital role in maintaining their cultural identity. As they were stripped of their native languages, customs, and even families, music became one of the few remaining links to their homelands. In this context, the early form of the banjo emerged as a key instrument in the African American musical tradition.
The Banjo in American Slavery
Once in the Americas, enslaved Africans began to reconstruct their traditional instruments using the materials available to them. The early American banjo was typically made from a gourd, with a skin stretched over the opening and a wooden neck attached. This instrument was popular among slaves in the Caribbean and the southern United States, where it was used in a variety of social and religious contexts, including celebrations, dances, and spiritual gatherings.
By the 17th and 18th centuries, the banjo had become a common feature of plantation life, with enslaved people playing it to accompany dances, songs, and storytelling. White observers in the early colonies took note of the instrument and its significance to African musical traditions. As the years went by, the banjo was gradually adopted by white musicians, particularly in minstrel shows, which often caricatured Black culture. Despite this problematic history, the banjo’s African roots remained undeniable.
Evolution and Influence of the Banjo
The banjo’s design evolved over time, especially as it became popular in white American culture. By the early 19th century, American craftsmen began manufacturing commercial versions of the banjo, replacing the gourd body with wooden frames and adding metal strings and tuning pegs. This transformation helped shape the modern banjo, but its African origins were never forgotten, even as the instrument became more closely associated with white folk and country music in the United States.
In terms of cultural influence, the banjo played a central role in shaping American music. Enslaved Africans and their descendants continued to play the banjo in plantation fields and gatherings, creating a unique blend of African rhythms and melodies with European musical forms. This fusion laid the groundwork for several genres of American music, including blues, jazz, country, and bluegrass, all of which owe much of their development to African American creativity.
The Banjo as a Symbol of Cultural Survival
While the banjo is one of the few material inventions directly traceable to African slavery, its significance goes far beyond its physical form. The banjo represents the cultural survival of African people in the face of brutal oppression. Despite being cut off from their homelands, languages, and many of their traditions, enslaved Africans found ways to preserve their musical heritage and adapt it to their new reality. In doing so, they created something new that became an enduring part of the American cultural landscape.
The story of the banjo also highlights the complexity of cultural exchange in the Americas. What began as an African instrument was eventually appropriated by white musicians and used in minstrel shows to mock and stereotype African Americans. Yet, even in this appropriation, the instrument’s African roots persisted, and today, the banjo is recognized as a symbol of African American resilience and creativity.
The banjo is perhaps the only true invention directly born out of the experience of African slavery. It represents the incredible ability of enslaved people to innovate and adapt, even in the face of unimaginable suffering. While its history is intertwined with the painful legacy of slavery, the banjo also stands as a testament to the cultural endurance and creativity of African people. In today’s world, where the banjo is celebrated in American music across genres, it serves as a reminder of the rich African heritage that continues to influence global culture.
By recognizing the banjo’s origins and its journey through slavery to modern times, we honor the creativity and resilience of those who were enslaved, and we ensure that their contributions are never forgotten.
About the Author
