CS:GO, or Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, has long been touted as a reliable benchmarking tool for PC gaming. With its demanding graphics and intense gameplay, it’s easy to see why. However, upon closer inspection, CS:GO falls short as a true benchmarking tool.
One of the main issues with CS:GO as a benchmarking tool is its inconsistent performance. While some areas of the game are highly demanding, others are not. This means that the FPS (frames per second) results obtained from benchmarking CS:GO may not be a true reflection of a system’s overall performance. In other words, a high FPS in CS:GO doesn’t necessarily mean a high FPS in other games.
Another problem with using CS:GO as a benchmarking tool is its reliance on CPU performance. CS:GO is notorious for being a CPU-heavy game, which means that the performance of the GPU (graphics processing unit) is not accurately reflected in benchmark results. This can be misleading for PC gamers who want to compare the performance of different graphics cards.
Furthermore, CS:GO’s lack of advanced graphics options also limits its use as a benchmarking tool. Unlike other games that offer a wide range of graphics settings, CS:GO only provides basic options such as resolution and anti-aliasing. This means that it’s not possible to accurately test the performance of higher-end graphics cards that require more advanced settings to showcase their full potential.
In conclusion, while CS:GO can be a useful tool for testing the performance of lower-end PCs, it falls short as a true benchmarking tool for PC gaming. Its inconsistent performance, reliance on CPU performance, and lack of advanced graphics options limit its usefulness for PC gamers who want to accurately compare the performance of different systems and components. As such, CS:GO should be used with caution when benchmarking PC gaming performance.
